United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
799 F.3d 1361 · 2015
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 471 (Counterfeit Deterrence Act of 1992)
Relies on Brigham City v. Stuart · Florida v. Jardines · Coffin v. Brandau · United States v. Lewis · United States v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“going to someone's house before sunrise to knock on the door is unreasonable and exceeds the implied invitation that underlies the knock and talk exception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. French v. Merrill“the officers entered [the carport] because they had reason to believe the house's occupant was sitting in the car parked inside.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. French v. Merrill“to speak with the homeowner, which is conduct that falls squarely within the scope of the knock and talk exception”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. French v. Merrill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.