Gladney v. Pollard’s Empirical Analysis
799 F.3d 889 · 2015
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Estelle v. McGuire · Schlup v. Delo · Griffith v. Kentucky · Linkletter v. Walker · Herrera v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he point of the exception is to ensure that 'federal constitutional errors do not result in the incarceration of innocent persons.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reliable evidence-whether it be exculpatory scientific evidence, trustworthy eyewitness accounts, or critical physical evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arnold v. Dittmann“The Supreme Court has not recognized a petitioner's right to habeas relief based on a stand-alone claim of actual innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.