799 F. Supp. 2d 854 - ANTELIS v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1658 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Erickson v. Pardus · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he time at which a plaintiff should discover the facts that constitute the violation cannot take place before the plaintiff is able to discover such facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“access to the relevant information even if he had endeavored to seek it out.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no indication that Plaintiff had any reason to even suspect fraud”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.