Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 N.E.2d 29 - Johnson v. Eldridge

Johnson v. Eldridge’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Orr v. Turco Manufacturing Co. · Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. Stanley · Cahoon v. Cummings · Van Winkle v. Nash · Emergency Physicians of Indianapolis v. Pettit

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) within one (1) year after a claim is filed in the court, or any longer period determined by the court to be necessary upon a showing of good cause, the party who filed the claim fails to make a written offer of settlement to the party or parties against whom a claim is filed; (2) the terms of the offer fail to provide for payment of the settlement offer within sixty (60) days after the offer is accepted; or (3) the amount of the offer exceeds one and one-third (1 1/3) of the amount of the judgment awarded.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) If the court awards prejudgment interest, the court shall determine the period during which prejudgment interest accrues. However the period may not exceed forty-eight (48) months. Prejudgment interest begins to accrue on the latest of the following dates: (1)Fifteen (15) months after the cause of action accrued. (2) Six (6) months after the claim is filed in court of [I.C. § ] 34-18-8 and [I.C. § ] 34-18-9 do not apply. (3) One hundred eighty (180) days after a medical review panel is formed to review the claim under [I.C. § ] 34-18-10 (or [I.C. § ] 27-12-10) before its repeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[the purpose of the Tort Prejudgment Interest Statute is to encourage settlement and to compensate the plaintiff for the lost time value of money.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.