Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 NW2D 583 - Tucker v. State

Tucker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Misquadace · State v. Stumm · Taylor v. State · State v. Ming Sen Shiue · State v. Rourke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Although every second-degree unintentional felony murder will undoubtedly involve some degree of cruelty, a district court may use particular cruelty as a basis for departure only when the cruelty associated with the crime for which the defendant was convicted is of a kind not usually associated with the commission of the offense in question. Short of a finding of this nature, a district court abuses its discretion in imposing an upward departure based on particular cruelty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.