Vance v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 493 So. 2d 952 - Rutland v. Pridgen · 716 So. 2d 592 - Moody v. State · 635 So. 2d 1352 - Martin v. State · Edwards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial judge is not bound by the terms of a plea agreement because it is the product of a bargaining process between the defendant and the prosecutor, and the judge is not a party to the agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“What Vance fails to incorporate into his analysis is that a recommendation is just that, a recommendation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.