McClinton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Bearden v. Georgia · Brown v. State · 562 So. 2d 1206 - Riely v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]robation may be revoked upon a showing that a defendant `more likely than not' violated the terms of probation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) written notice of the claimed violations of (probation or) parole; (b) disclosure to the (probationer or) parolee of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a “neutral and detached” hearing body such as a traditional parole board, members of which need not be judicial officers or [lawyers]; and (f) a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking (probation or) parole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“due process requires that the trial judge at least orally inform the defendant of the terms and conditions upon which his suspended sentence is contingent before it may be properly revoked for violations of those terms and conditions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.