Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 SO2D 263 - Bator v. Osborne

Bator v. Osborne’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 670 So. 2d 1058 - State Dept. of Revenue v. Kiedaisch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “section 61.30(7) requires the trial court, in apportioning child care costs, to reduce the total of those costs by twenty-five percent and then add the remainder to the basic obligation, which is then apportioned pursuant to statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.