Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 So. 2d 384 - Lock v. State

799 So. 2d 384 - Lock v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on San Martin v. State · 703 So. 2d 1038 - Hamilton v. State · 273 So. 2d 70 - Loftin v. State · 330 So. 2d 470 - State v. Rucker · Potter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial judge's ruling on a motion to suppress is clothed with a presumption of correctness, and the ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.