799 So. 2d 391 - Langbaum v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 358 So. 2d 183 - Hines v. State · 446 So. 2d 1079 - Maselli v. State · 588 So. 2d 255 - Hope v. State · 603 So. 2d 535 - Palmer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[d]efendant expressed no doubt at -4- the VOP hearing as to what he was accused of doing to warrant revocation of his probation”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]e find this to be harmless error since the record shows that the probationer clearly had actual notice of the charges, that he was arrested near the scene of the crime shortly after its occurrence, and that he made a confession to his involvement. There was no violation of the probationer’s due process rights. Petitioner’s probation was revoked upon adequate proof of [the crime] for which he was arrested by Deputy Blosser on 3/13/76. The circumstances here are not comparable to those cases in which a person’s probation has been revoked based upon proof of charges other than those with which he was notified in the affidavit of violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.