799 So. 2d 810 - Romans v. Romans’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 700 So. 2d 533 - Havener v. Havener · 687 So. 2d 685 - Gould v. Gould · McHale v. McHale · 605 So. 2d 1162 - Timmons v. Timmons · 773 So. 2d 185 - Curtis v. Curtis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he trial court's conclusions of fact regarding financial matters underlying an award of child support will not be disturbed in the absence of manifest error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDaniel v. McDaniel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.