Massey v. Huggins’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · 689 So. 2d 770 - Bredemeier v. Jackson · 677 So. 2d 740 - Riley v. Doerner · 631 So. 2d 812 - Murphy v. Murphy · 656 So. 2d 325 - Williams v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]ue process require[s] that appellant have fair notice from an appropriate pleading that an increase in the amount of the support award was being sought and was under consideration, so that he might have reasonable opportunity to offer evidence touching both the needs of the children and his ability to pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is error for a chancellor, upon the chancellor's own motion, to order a party to pay child support `absent any notice that [the party] would be required to defend such a proposition and absent any notice that the court was considering ordering [the party] to pay child support.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was not provided notice that she 'might be required to defend a claim of child support' nor was there a 'suggestion in the record that support payments from [the appellant] were even being contemplated by the court on its own or asked for by' [the appellee].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.