Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 SW2D 304 - Ex Parte Williams

Ex Parte Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2018

10 state decisions

60199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Missouri v. Hunter · United States v. Halper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this cause the contempt conviction was sought by a private party, not on behalf of the State. Although the power of the State was used to obtain the punishment, through the state court and jail, the State did not seek this punishment. We believe the jeopardy provisions protect only against prosecutions by persons on behalf of the same sovereign, and the contempt conviction here, while “criminal” in nature, is not the “same offense” as the attempted capital murder the State is now seeking to prosecute. Whether the crimes would pass a Blockburger analysis is not relevant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Most other jurisdictions addressing the criminal contempt/criminal conviction problem have concluded that double jeopardy does not bar convictions for both, but have relied on a variety of rationales.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.