State v. Storey’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Ventresca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there was probable cause to search the entire place articulated in the warrant, [so] it was not necessary for the magistrate to take into account who else was living there when he authorized the place to be searched.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Austin B.“[s]earch warrants are not directed at persons; they authorize the search of places and the seizure of things, and as a constitutional matter they need not even name the person from whom the things will be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Austin B.“[O]ur ultimate inquiry asks whether the magistrate made a 'practical, common-sense determination' that 'there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Austin B.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.