¶1We think the (affidavits amply sufficient, unexplained, to warrant the orders of arrest.
¶2Orders appealed from affirmed.
¶3Present, Ingraham, P. J., and Barnard and Brady, JJ.
8 Abb. Pr. 141
Wilmerding v. Cohen
Decided April 15, 1870
New York Supreme Court · decided 1870-04-15
Appeals from orders of arrest. Three actions were brought against S. A. Cohen and. Abraham Cohen, defendants and appellants ; one by Henry A. Wilmerding and others ; another by Effinerham Townsend and others ; and a third by L. E. Schmieder; in each of which orders of arrest were obtained by the above named plaintiffs, who were respectively auctioneers in this city, against the defendants, on two grounds: 1. Fraudulently contracting the respective debts. 2.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1870-04-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1936
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →