¶1In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4), and (2) that the contract on which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 31 of the Personal Property Law (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 107, subd. 7). Order affirmed, with $10 caste and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallman and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
8 A.D.2d 620
Reed v. Kostynick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 6, 1959
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1959-04-06
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1962
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1959-04-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →