Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 ALAAPP 187 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Stokley v. State (1950), Patterson v. State (1918)

43 state decisions

9019131920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morris v. State · State ex rel. Attorney General v. Tally · McAnally v. State · Pierson v. State · Griffith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A criminal conspiracy is a distinct, substantive offense, complete when the corrupt agreement is entered into. Such agreement is the very gist of the offense, and it is not necessary to a conviction for a conspiracy alone that any act should be done in pursuance of it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.