Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Ala. App. 343

Young v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1913

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1913-06-17

Heard before Hou. H. A. Pearce. Emanuel Young was convicted of an offense and he appeals. Submitted on motion to strike bill of exceptions, and on the merits. Counsel discusses the case on its merits, but in view of the opinion, it is not deemed necessary to here set it out.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1925

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Motion to strike bill of exceptions granted and cause… · Decided 1913-06-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THOMAS, J.

¶1— This case is submitted on the merits, and on the motion of the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions. The motion must prevail, since it appears that the bill of exceptions was not presented to or filed with the trial judge Avithin 90 days from the day on which the judgment was entered; the judgment having been entered on November 12, 1912, and the bill presented to the trial judge on February 12, 1913, 92 days thereafter. — Code, § 3019.

¶2We have examined the record proper, and find no errors therein. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

¶3Affirmed.

/8/alaapp/343 · .json · Public domain