State v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 55 Cal. 2d 211 - Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District · Stone v. Arizona Highway Commission · 66 Cal. 2d 468 - Tammen v. County of San Diego · 66 Cal. 2d 24 - Viles v. State of California · McKay v. Industrial Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Persons having claims on contract or for negligence against the state, which have been disallowed, may on the terms and conditions set forth in this article, bring action thereon against the state and prosecute the action to final judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.