8 Ariz. App. 261 - State v. Meek’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · Tumey v. State of Ohio · Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. · Mississippi Pub Corporation v. Murphree · McKay v. Industrial Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““During the examination of any witness, or when the defendant is making a statement or testifying, the magistrate may and on the request of the defendant shall exclude all other witnesses. He may also cause the witnesses to be kept separate and prevented from communicating with each other until all are examined. The magistrate shall also, upon the request of the defendant, exclude from the examination every person except attorneys in the case, and officers of the court.” (Emphasis supplied)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The following action was taken by the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona on Tuesday, December 3, 1968, in regard to the above-entitled cause: “ ‘ORDERED: Petition for reconsideration of order denying Petition for Review — GRANTED. “ ‘FURTHER ORDERED : Remanded to Court of Appeals with directions to determine case on merits.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.