8 Ariz. App. 3 - Tsipai v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County · State Board of Technical Registration v. McDaniel · 2 Ariz. App. 593 - Peterson v. Jacobson · 1 Ariz. App. 334 - Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County · 49 Wash. 2d 605 - Kennett v. Levine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is, of course, an implication that the legislature intended to establish the same procedure as to jury trial in both nonrecord courts [justice court and police court]. “Fundamental rights should not depend upon an arbitrary choice as to the court in which they are instituted. There must be uniformity of treatment in criminal prosecutions, not depending on the place of prosecution, and this includes the right of trial by jury. The right to a jury trial should be jealously guarded and preserved by the courts, whether granted by the constitution or statutes.” 100 Ariz. at 46-47 , 410 P.2d at 486 . (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.