Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Ariz. App. 447 - Shaw v. State

8 Ariz. App. 447 - Shaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably New Times, Inc. v. Arizona Board of Regents (1974), Flippin v. Jarrell (1980)

50 state decisions

260196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Stephenson v. Binford · Hernandez v. Frohmiller · White v. Moore · State v. Espinosa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of constitutional provisions such as ours, adopted in most states of the Union, is to prevent surprise and the evils of omnibus bills and surreptitious and hodge-podge legislation that were frequent in legislation prior to their adoption. [Citation omitted.] The question of the sufficiency of title: ‘ * * * is not one of intent on the part of the lawmakers in phrasing the title, but of its significance and meaning to those who might read it at that stage of its history when it was only a bill going through the process of its enactment into law.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The state may set limitations upon the method and manner of bringing suit against the state as long as such methods are reasonable and do not violate any constitutional rights. ... (Emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.