Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Ariz. App. 526 - State v. Counterman

8 Ariz. App. 526 - State v. Counterman’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
3
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

2 district · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich (1984), State v. Gerlaugh (1982)

2 district · 51 state decisions

2001969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Brady v. State of Maryland · Gideon v. Wainwright · Gault · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Q. Now, did you, aside from the evidence which you have indicated that you took into custody, did you take any other evidence into custody? A. Yes, sir. Q. What was that ? A. One white woman’s brassiere Q. Whom did that belong to? A. To the victim. Q. You say the victim, you mean Mrs. Bachman ? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did that have any marks on it? A. Yes, sir, it had. Q. What marks were they ? A. It had powder tattooing, and I believe a small amount of blood.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"... where more than one offense than that charged in the information is admitted in evidence the trial court has the duty to require the State to elect upon which of the offenses it relies for conviction.” 8 Ariz.App. at 531 , 448 P. 2d at 101 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The rule does not apply, however, ‘where a series of acts form part of one and the same transaction, and as a whole constitute but one and the same offense.’ ” 8 Ariz.App. at 531 , 448 P.2d at 101 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.