Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Ark. App. 51 - McCune v. Brown

8 Ark. App. 51 - McCune v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2024

20 state decisions

10019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boling v. Gibson · Bramlett v. Selman · Festinger v. Kantor · Batesville Truck Line, Inc. v. Martin · Whitten Developments, Inc. v. Agee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the situation of the parties.” Other courts have been more explicit. In McCune v. Brown, 648 S.W.2d 811, 814 (Ark. Ct. App. 1983), the court said: "The rule with respect to delivery of gifts is not so strictly applied to transactions between members of a family.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We do not reach this issue, since we find that appellant did not timely file her motion to transfer . . . Approximately five months have transpired between the time of the original answer and the filing of the motion to transfer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We have also held that by failure to make a timely motion to transfer, in a case of this kind, a party waives the right unless the equity court is wholly incompetent to grant the relief sought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.