Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Bedell 162 - Smith v. . Coe

Smith v. . Coe’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
August 1962
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 1962 · most notably A. & S. Henry & Co. v. Talcott (1903), Hoffman v. American Mills Co. (1923)

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

1401902191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSmith v. Coe

Relationships

Relies on 3 E.H. Smith 137 - Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co. · Marston v. . Swett · Gurney v. Atlantic & Great Western Railway Co. · Fleischmann v. . Stern · Bierman v. . City Mills Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The allegations of a complaint are controverted or put in issue only by a general or specific denial. A material fact alleged is not controverted or put in issue by a statement inconsistent with the facts alleged, or from which a general denial may be implied or inferred.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.