Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Beeler 258 - State Ex Rel. v. Link

State Ex Rel. v. Link’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1988

10 state decisions

40193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The Legislature cannot remove a county judge by abolishing the office and devolving the duties upon a chairman of the county court. State v. Leonard, 86 Tenn. 485 , 7 S.W. 453 . The distinction between statutes ineffective to remove a judge from office, and statutes that accomplish removal by abolishing the tribunal and transferring its business to another, was made clear by Mr. Justice Wilkes in Judges' Cases, 102 Tenn. 509, 560 , 53 S.W. 134 , 146, 46 L.R.A. 567 , * * *," all of which was referred to in the original opinion by the quoted matter to be found therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.