Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Blackf. 5

Weaver v. Jackson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1846

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1846-05-25

<p>If the defendant plead in abatement a misnomer of his Christian name, the plaintiff having confessed the plea to be true, and proved that the process had been served on the real defendant, may be permitted under the statute, on payment of costs, to amend the declaration by striking out the wrong name and inserting the right one.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1856

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1846-05-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Dewey, J.

¶1Case. Plea, not guilty. "Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs below.

¶2On the calling of the cause, the defendant put in a plea in abatement for a misnomer, stating that he was sued by the Christian name of William, when in fact his Christian name was Boston. The plaintiffs admitting the plea to be true, and having proved that the process had been served on the real defendant Boston. Weaver, moved for leave to amend *6the declaration by striking out William and inserting Boston. The motion was granted, and the declaration immediately amended accordingly; whereupon the defendant pleaded the general issue and went to trial.

M. G. Bright, for the plaintiff.

¶3The error complained of is the leave to amend the declaration.

¶4We think, however, the leave was correctly given. The statute provides that the Court, in which any action! is pending, may give leave to amend any process, pleading, or proceeding in such action, either in form or substance, for the furtherance of justice, at the costs of the party amending, at any time before commencing the trial. R. S. 1843, p. 713. The amendment allowed saved delay and was evidently in furtherance of justice. It was therefore within the provision of the statute.

Per Curiam.

¶5The judgment is affirmed with costs.

/8/blackf/5 · .json · Public domain