Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Blackf. 574

Ingle v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1848

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1848-01-25

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1848-01-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1884

1 district · 5 state decisions

2018481850186018701880decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1A. BEING indicted for an assault 'and battery and bound by a recognizance to answer the charge, was advised by his attorney that -if he, A., could not procure a continuance of the cause on affidavit, “ he then could escape and forfeit his recognizance, which would work a continuance of said cause until the next term at a trifling cost.” Held, that the attorney was not, for giving said advice, guilty of a contempt of Court.

¶2If an attorney be fined in such case for a contempt, he may have a writ of error. R. S. 1843, p. 664.

/8/blackf/574 · .json · Public domain