Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 B.T.A. 1111

Steefel v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 31, 1927

United States Board of Tax Appeals · decided 1927-10-31

Sections 1200 and 1201 of the Revenue Act of 1924 do not authorize a 25 per cent reduction of tax on 1924 income reported in 1925 but taxable at 1923 rates. Appeal of Charles Colip,5 B.T.A. 123.

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1929

Relies on Colip v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1opinion.

Van Fossan :

¶2This proceeding is submitted upon the pleadings and stipulation filed, the sole iss’ue for decision being whether or not the petitioner is entitled to a 25 per cent reduction under sections 1200 *1112and 1201 of the Revenue Act of 1924 in the tax due at 1923 rates on that portion of said partnership profits distributable to the petitioner on January 31, 1924, and reported by the petitioner in his income-tax return for the calendar year 1924.

¶3The facts, in all essential respects, and the question involved in this case are identical with those considered in Appeal of Charles Colip, 5 B. T. A. 123, and upon the authority of that decision.

¶4Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Considered by MaRquette, Phillips, and Milliken.
/8/bta/1111 · .json · Public domain