Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 CAL 449 - Kane v. Cook

Kane v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1857

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
10
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 1999 · most notably 21 Cal. 4th 383 - Norgart v. Upjohn Co. (1999), 25 Cal. 2d 226 - Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. (1944)

3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions — followed in 10 states

60185718601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Troup v. Executors of Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “They proceed upon the theory that the delay, for a fixed period, to assert one's claim, raises a presumption of settlement, and that a party ought not to be afterwards harassed respecting it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.