Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Cal. 84

Feeny v. Daly

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1857

California Supreme Court · decided 1857-07-01

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, County of El Dorado.</p> <p>Peeny sued Daly, in the Court below, on a debt created on the seventeenth of October, 1854, and alleged that the defendant, on the eighth day of May, 1855, was discharged from the operation of this particular debt, under the Insolvent Law; but that after-wards, to wit, upon the--day of June, 1855, the defendant, in consideration of the original indebtedness, promised and agreed to pay plaintiff the amount of his debt. The case was tried before the Court below, sitting as a jury, who found, as facts, “the existence of the indebtedness,” as alleged by plaintiff; the discharge of the defendant therefrom, under the Insolvent Law, and his subsequent “ express verbal promise to pay the debt,” on which finding, judgment was rendered for plaintiff, from which this appeal was had.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1960

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1857-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Terry, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

¶1The debt of an insolvent bankrupt is due in conscience, not-, withstanding his discharge, and is a sufficient consideration to \ support a subsequent express promise to pay.

¶2A verbal promise is sufficient at common law, and there is nothing in our statutes which changes the rule.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/8/cal/84 · .json · Public domain