Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Cal. 3d 440 - Hulland v. State Bar

8 Cal. 3d 440 - Hulland v. State Bar’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2005 · most notably 21 Cal. 3d 61 - Isbell v. County of Sonoma (1978), 45 Cal. 3d 589 - Hawk v. State Bar (1988)

29 state decisions

1201972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co. · 63 Cal. 2d 153 - Isrin v. Superior Court · 2 Cal. 3d 719 - Simmons v. State Bar · Clancy v. State Bar · Atlas Credit Corp. v. Ezrine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a confession of judgment ... puts at the disposal of the creditor the most drastic of enforcement proceedings. [It] forecloses the presentation of any possible defense or controversy for judicial resolution; to the contrary it is a personal admission of a debt obligation upon which the court places its primatur.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Our holding ... is not controlling precedent for other facts of other cases. For example, where the contract is one of adhesion, where there is great disparity in bargaining power, and where the debtor receives nothing for the cognovit provision, other legal consequences may ensue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “creates a situation in which the client's ignorance of legal matters makes it unlikely that he will understand the character and effect of the instrument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.