8 Cal. 4th 68 - People v. Tyrell J.’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 271 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 284 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 22 Cal. 4th 900 - People v. Jenkins (2000), 19 Cal. 4th 743 - People v. Reyes (1998)
4 federal appellate · 271 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Bell v. Wolfish
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 284 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] juvenile probationer subject to a valid search condition does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy over his or her person or property. In this case, Tyrell J. was subject to a valid search condition, directly imposed on him by the juvenile court in a prior matter. We presume he was aware of that limitation on his freedom, and that any police officer, probation officer, or school official could at any time stop him on the street, at school, or even enter his home, and ask that he submit to a warrantless search. There is no indication the minor was led to believe that only police officers who were aware of the condition would validly execute it. The minor certainly could not reasonably have believed Officer Villemin would not search him, for he did not know whether Villemin was aware of the search condition. Thus, any expectation the minor may have had concerning the privacy of his bag of marijuana was manifestly unreasonable.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“'Even conditions which infringe on constitutional rights may not be invalid if tailored specifically to meet the needs of the juvenile....'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“at the time that decision was rendered, there existed no automatic search condition imposed on parolees....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.