Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 Cal. App. 124 - Needham v. Chandler

8 Cal. App. 124 - Needham v. Chandler’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1932
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 2 Cal. App. 699 - Camp v. Behlow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The object of findings is to determine such .issue or issues. Findings should be so construed as to support the judgment where it can be done. If apparently inconsistent, they should be reconciled, if reasonably possible to do so. If upon an immaterial issue, they should be disregarded. If, taking them as a whole, in view of the entire record, they fairly dispose of the material issues raised by the pleadings on which evidence was offered, the judgment will be upheld.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.