Daniel v. Wayans’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson · 29 Cal. 4th 82 - Navellier v. Sletten · 2 Cal. 3d 493 - Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To show a probability of prevailing on his claims, ' "the plaintiff 'must demonstrate that the complaint is both legally sufficient and supported by a sufficient prima facie showing of facts to sustain a favorable judgment if the evidence submitted by the plaintiff is credited.' [Citations.] ... [T]hough the court does not weigh the credibility or comparative probative strength of competing evidence, it should grant the motion if, as a matter of law, the defendant's evidence supporting the motion defeats the plaintiff's attempt to establish evidentiary support for the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Nigga is not an unambiguous racial epithet in today's world, especially when used intraracially[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' "[c]auses of action do not arise from motives; they arise from acts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.