Burchinell v. Koon’s Empirical Analysis
1896
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1933
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Union Nat Bank of Chicago v. Bank of Kansas City · Fitzpatrick v. Flannagan · Williams v. . Whedon · Emerson v. Senter · Howard v. McDonough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We do not regard the case as at all affected by the fact that a portion of the fund represented by the note was advanced to the survivor after the death of the other member of the firm. The money went into the general firm account, was for the benefit of the estate as controlled by the survivor, and was applied to the liquidation of outstanding firm obligations.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Yturriaga v. Cobeaga
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.