Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Cow. 111

Knickerbacker v. Colver

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1828

New York Supreme Court · decided 1828-02-15

A NON*BAILABLE capias ad respondendum was issued *** f against Oolver and Hawes jointly at the suit of the plain- ^ f°r a false imprisonment committed by Hawes.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1828-02-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1972

3 state decisions

101828183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Curia.

¶1Where the process is not bailable, it may go against any number of defendants jointly; and yet the plamtiff may declare against them severally. (3 John. 538; l T. E. 696[697. l B * P. 49; 6 B. * P. 82.)

¶2By the course of proceeding, these suits became separate tQ eyery purpose; and are not to be considered as a joint suit defended by each defendant sirnvl cum the other. The defendants are to be treated as joint trespassers sued separately, in which case the plaintiff can' have but one satis* *112faction; but he may assess damages separately; and then elect de melioribus damnis, and recover costs against . ° The plaintiff, therefore, is entitled to recover his damages but once ; and having either received them from Hawes, or discharged him without payment, that act must be considered a satisfaction or release of the damages as to both. The plaintiff ought not to collect the damages on the other execution. The five dollars damages must be indorsed satisfied on that; but the costs may be collected.

¶3Eule accordingly.

/8/cow/111 · .json · Public domain