Ex parte Lassell

Decided February 15, 1828

New York Supreme Court · decided 1828-02-15

Jake Ulma, having taken an assignment of a note payable to one Sterling in specific articles, against the relator, *sued him before a justice of St. Lawrence county, in Sterling’s name as plaintiff. The justice gave judgment in favor of Lassell. Jane Ulma appealed to the C. P. of St. Lawrence; and the appeal bond was not executed by Sterling, but by Jane Ulma and a surety.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1894

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1828-02-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Curia.

¶1The motion must be denied. We have decided, generally, that the party appealing must execute the appeal bond ; but this may be the real as well as the nominal party. It is not confined to the party on record. The C. P. were right, and the motion must be denied. •

¶2Motion denied.