Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 F.1d 163 - The Clatsop Chief

The Clatsop Chief’s Empirical Analysis

8 F. 163 · 1881

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 1954
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1954

1 federal appellate · 8 district ·

6018811890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The "Sabine" · Chicago & Northwestern Railroad v. Moranda · Newell v. Norton and Ship · Holmes v. O. & C. Ry. Co. · Gormly v. Vulcan Iron Works

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““My own impression of the matter is with Mr. Benedict, when he says (Ben. Adm. § 397) ‘that whenever the libelant’s cause of action gives Mm a lien or privilege against the thing, and a full personal right against the owner, then lie may, by a libel properly framed, proceed against the person and the thing, and compel the owner to come in and to submit to the decree of the court against him personally in the same suit, for any possible deficiency.’ It is a question simply of procedure, and should be determined in ainly, if not altogether, upon considerations of fitness and convenience; and every argument drawn from this source is in favor of the joinder of the remedies in rem and in personam, whoever the person may be, and pursuing them in one libel, as one suit.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.