The Commack’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.2d 151 · 1925
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1993
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Commack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the acts of the master cannot raise an equity in favor of the [suppliers], entitling them to postpone the payment of intervenors who under the admiralty law are entitled to maritime liens. The acts of the intervenors might have this effect, but not those of the Master, owner or officers of the Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oil Shipping Bv“no principle of law which makes it the duty of the custodian to notify parties dealing with the master that he is custodian....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oil Shipping Bv“there was no act of libelant which induced the [suppliers] to expend the labor or furnish the supplies to the vessel....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oil Shipping Bv
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.