Marks v. Leo Feist, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.2d 460 · 1925
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2015 · most notably Fogerty Fantasy Inc (1994), 491 F. Supp. 908 - Boz Scaggs Music v. KND Corp. (1980)
21 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oelrichs v. Spain · Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum · Railway Company v. Heck · United States v. Babbitt · Arcambel v. Wiseman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In all actions, suits, or proceedings under this title, except when brought by or against the United States or any officer thereof, full costs shall be allowed, and the court may award to the prevailing party a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“So far as this record shows, the complaint was dismissed on the plaintiff's motion, and the decree entered was in effect a decree by consent. And from such a decree the plaintiff cannot appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.