Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 F.2d 608 - Jutila v. Frye

Jutila v. Frye’s Empirical Analysis

8 F.2d 608 · 1925

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 1965
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1965

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

3019251930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anthes v. Anthes · Trask v. Boise King Placers Co. · Bonham National Bank of Fairbury v. Grimes Pass Placer Mining Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.