United States v. Hohn’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 1301 · 1993
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2021 · most notably Hohn v. United States (1998), United States v. Reinholz (2001)
26 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Henderson v. United States · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · Brendale v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation · Fussell v. Price
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The magistrate judge found in an opinion adopted by the district court that as a preliminary matter there was sufficient evidence to find that Central Park was a school. The final determination as to whether Central Park met the statutory definition of school was determined by the magistrate judge to be a question of fact appropriate for the jury. We agree. The Omaha public school system continued to carry Central Park on its books as a school. The children continued to use the school grounds. A school need not be in session to trigger the schoolyard statute’s penalties. The district court did not err when it denied Hohn’s motion to dismiss Count I.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]or conviction, [§ 860(a)] simply requires that the defendant have an intent to distribute (or manufacture) a controlled substance and at the time be within 1000 feet of a school.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'Motions excludable under subsection (F) include any pretrial motion and are not limited to those motions enumerated' in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.