Woolery v. Arave’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 1325 · 1993
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2022
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Teague v. Lane · Stone v. Powell · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to afford Woolery the opportunity to show that the state court did not offer him a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We read Stone as a categorical limitation on the applicability of fourth amendment exclusionary rules in habeas corpus proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.