Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 F.3d 1379 - United States v. Reyes

United States v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis

8 F.3d 1379 · 1993

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Rashtabadi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1994), United States v. Ponce (1995)

59 federal appellate · 1 district ·

630199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 994 · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Powers v. Ohio · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) when review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process, (2) when a change in law raises a new issue while an appeal is pending, and (3) when the issue is purely one of law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “significantly less serious than that of most defendants in the same criminal history category”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the comparative treatment of offenders with the same career offender base offense level....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.