United States v. Meuli’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 1481 · 1993
Citation profile
34 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Stewart (2006), United States v. Simpson (1996)
34 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allen v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Brewster v. Derwinski · Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · California Department of Transportation v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[M]ultiplicity refers to multiple counts of an indictment which cover the same criminal behavior.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review the imposition of a fine under the Sentencing Guidelines for an abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Defendant contends that he met his burden of establishing his inability to pay a fine.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.