Edmond v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 290 · 1993
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (1996), Great Plains Trust Company v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co (2002)
20 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Sumner v. Mata · Marshall v. Lonberger · Sumner v. Mata
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]vidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A 'reasonable probability' is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“On appeal, we do not review issues not briefed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Andrews v. Collins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.