Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 8 F.3d 329 - United States v. Moriarty

United States v. Moriarty’s Empirical Analysis

8 F.3d 329 · 1993

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Mickey Gregory, As Administrator of the Estate of Gerald Gregory,/cross v. Shelby County, Tennessee (2000), Tanya Mixon v. The State of Ohio and Michael White (1999)

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

150199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Price v. United States · United States v. Updike · The United States v. The State Bank of North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For purposes of [a motion brought pursuant to Rule 12(c) ] “all well-pleaded material allegations of the [non-movant] must be taken as true.” “The motion is granted when no material issue of fact exists and the party making the motion is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” United States v. Moriarty, 8 F.3d 329, 332 (6th Cir.1993) (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “nothing in the statutory scheme indicates that this substitution was meant to change the law substantively,” courts interpreting the term”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.