Ticey v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 498 · 1993
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Bischel v. United States (1994), Commonwealth v. Brown (2012)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · California v. Green · Sumner v. Mata · Bates v. State Bar · Thompson v. City of Louisville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) the declarant was available for cross-examination; 2) the statement was made shortly after the events related and was transcribed promptly; 3) the declarant knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to remain silent; 4) the declarant admitted making the statement; and 5) there was some corroboration of the statement’s reliability. Vogel [v. Percy], 691 F.2d [843,] at 847 [(7th Cir.1982)] (citing United States v. Leslie, 542 F.2d 285 (5th Cir.1976)). All the factors focus on the reliability of the statement and the fairness of the circumstances under which the statement was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stone-Bey v. Swihart“A look at Leslie illustrates that the factors were not meant to be a litmus test for the admissibility (and reliability) of a prior inconsistent statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.