Jenkins v. Gramley’s Empirical Analysis
8 F.3d 505 · 1993
Citation profile
35 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Hogan v. McBride (1996), Burris v. Farley (1995)
35 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Fay v. Noia · Harris v. Reed · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Ylst v. Nunnemaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Circuit Rule 34(f). No such statement having been filed, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record 1 Muzard neither alleges cause for the default and prejudice attributable thereto nor demonstrates that failure to consider the claims will result in a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] defendant who neglects to present his claims to the state court at all, and thereby denies it the opportunity to assert a forfeiture rule, has surrendered them just as surely as if he presents them in a procedurally defective manner.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A default supplies an independent and adequate state ground for the judgment, so that questions of federal law no longer affect the outcome. This implies that when the final state court to consider a case acts on the merits of the federal question, without simultaneously asserting an independent state ground of decision, the federal issue remains (potentially) dis-positive and is open to review under § 2254.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.